In Praise of Dissenters and Aginers
Here’s a bit of advice from Fredrick Manfred:
“Let’s start a cult in which we
make heroes out of such ornery cusses as we may still have around—out of our
lone wolves, go-it-aloners, dissenters, hermits, screwballs, aginers. Such a fad, the fad of the ornery cuss or the
oddball, might save us. It is still a
truth that the health of a society can be measured by the size and the vigor of
its minority group.
“In fact, I’d like to recommend
that every village and town go out of its way to make sure it still has an
ornery cuss in its midst. At least
one. And should any village discover it
doesn’t have an honorable dissenter around, I’d like to suggest that the mayor
declare a state of emergency until such a citizen can be found.”
A small college is a village, so a college ought also to
have its dissenters and aginers. Especially
in the faculty and student body. Among
administrators it is considered treason to go against authority. Administrators think of a college as a
business and they seem to believe that the business that is free from
dissension is likely to be successful. (Though I understand that some of the
really successful business actually encourage a culture of dissent.) Most administrators,
however, want peace and the appearance of harmony because they are always
marketing their college, and peace and harmony are attractive to most buyers
while disruption is off-putting.
But education often happens best when dissenters suddenly appear,
when division occurs, when authority or the status quo is challenged. When a few students challenge a professor’s
position, dozing students suddenly wake up.
When a few faculty members challenge an administration’s position,
suddenly people have to support their positions with genuine arguments measured
against an institutional statement of purpose.
(Unless the challengers and the statement of purpose are simply
ignored.)
When a Dordt College student challenges a glib and
indefensible position on healthcare by a Republican candidate for president in
a Republican dominated county, and the candidate cannot believe that Dordt
students could think such un-Republican thoughts, then it is clear that the
candidate knows little about education—or democracy. Though apparently he knows quite a bit about
Dordt since, according to rumor, the student felt so alone in his political
stance that he considered leaving Dordt.
And that’s a scary thing—that a college has a reputation for being so
homogeneous, so cloyingly uniform that outsiders are shocked when a contrary
voice is heard.
In my mind, this dissenting student ought to be Dordt’s student
of the year—if there is such an award and, of course, there shouldn’t be. Dordt desperately needs students who provoke
other students to examine their (often) unexamined lives. Even more it needs faculty to rile up
students and to remind administrators that Dordt is first of all an academic
institution, not a business. It needs
administrators who challenge each other and feel free to disagree. A Christian college needs some Old Testament
prophets.
Oh, I’m just getting started. More another time.
Dave--I like your thoughts on dissenion and education. I enthusiastically agree. Although I didn't always love to have a student raise his or her hand and completely disagree with me, I tried to remind myself that this was the purpose of class: to discuss and understand. That cannot be done thoroughly unless multiple view points are involved. College should still be a learning experience--when students challenge professors or administrators it is another learning opportunity for that student and the class. If that student's thoughts are squashed it shows the class that their opinions do not matter. Of course there are exceptions--the manner in which the student addresses the professor or administrator is important. But all in all, I look forward to hearing the rest of your thoughts. Emily Kramer
ReplyDeleteWell said, Dave. Thanks! It takes guts to be a contrarian, to go against the flow especially in the presence of one's peers and superiors, in a classroom for instance. My own education in taking the second take in a class, in life, came 1)from reading/living in Mark Twain's books (and having teachers ask what I was laughing about when I did--a not subtle form of punishment)and, in grade school from observing who did not laugh when, to the amusement of almost all, some student or other was ridiculed by our teacher. You, I recall, did not laugh on those occasions. So thanks again.
ReplyDelete