Paul Ryan's Moral Compass
I heard recently that conservative Christians,
uncomfortable with Romney’s Mormonism, have been trying to twist and tweak the
Mormon religion and/or Christianity so that in their own minds the Mormon faith
can be called a branch of Christianity.
If that could be done, they could vote for Romney and feel good about it
because he now, suddenly, would be a Christian.
I am, however, concerned about the faith of his running mate, Paul Ryan. Although he is a member of the Catholic Church, Ryan has said that “more than anyone else, Ayn Rand taught me quite a bit about what my value system and beliefs are.” “The reason I got involved in public service,” Ryan says, “by and large, if I had to credit one thinker, it would be Ayn Rand.” He says that Rand “does a fantastic job of explaining the morality of capitalism.” He believes that “an attack on democratic capitalism is an attack on the moral foundation of America.” What he means by democratic capitalism is, essentially, a free, unregulated market. Now anyone who sees that as the moral foundation of America scares the daylights out of me. But if it doesn’t scare you, perhaps you ought to learn a bit more about his guru, Ayn Rand.
It can’t be done, of course. You can’t make the Mormon faith just another
Christian denomination without changing both Christianity and Mormonism so much
that neither would any longer be what it was.
If I as a Christian wanted to vote for Romney, I
wouldn’t worry about his Mormonism. I won’t vote for Romney. I
simply don’t trust him. Nor do I like
his proposed policies. But his Mormon religion
does not concern me.I am, however, concerned about the faith of his running mate, Paul Ryan. Although he is a member of the Catholic Church, Ryan has said that “more than anyone else, Ayn Rand taught me quite a bit about what my value system and beliefs are.” “The reason I got involved in public service,” Ryan says, “by and large, if I had to credit one thinker, it would be Ayn Rand.” He says that Rand “does a fantastic job of explaining the morality of capitalism.” He believes that “an attack on democratic capitalism is an attack on the moral foundation of America.” What he means by democratic capitalism is, essentially, a free, unregulated market. Now anyone who sees that as the moral foundation of America scares the daylights out of me. But if it doesn’t scare you, perhaps you ought to learn a bit more about his guru, Ayn Rand.
To start, you can go to You-tube and find her
interview with Mike Wallace in which she says, “I am against God. I don’t approve of religion. It is a sign of psychological weakness. I reject it as evil.” She sees selfishness as a great good and
self-sacrifice as a great evil. This is
the woman whose morality of capitalism Paul
Ryan calls “fantastic.” No wonder his budget guts government policies that
assist the poor and the sick, children and old people.
Frequent Dordt College Plumbline speaker Michael
Gerson in a Washington Post column
quotes her as saying, “Man exists for his own sake, the pursuit of happiness is
his highest moral purpose, and he must not sacrifice himself to others . . . .” An article in Christianity Today by Gary Moore cites this epigram from Ayn
Rand: “I want to be known as the
greatest champion of reason and the greatest enemy of religion.”
Recently,
after Paul Ryan’s budget and his allegiance to Ayn Rand were criticized by the
Catholic bishops, Ryan said that his supposed admiration of Rand was an urban
legend. But, that’s a bald-face lie. You can go to You-tube to hear and see him
saying the things I have quoted above.
Of course he denied saying them when he realized that Catholics and the
Religious Right might not vote for a vice-presidential candidate who said such
things. But the video doesn’t lie.
Romney’s
Mormonism is nothing compared to Ryan’s Ayn Randism. And at the heart of this philosophy is radical individualism. In contrast, the church is a community, a body
made up of many parts. And in that body,
the strong help the weak, the wealthy help the poor. That doesn’t happen in Ayn
Rand’s “ideal” world. And it doesn’t happen in Paul Ryan’s proposed budget for
the next year.
Congressman Ryan’s proposed Republican budget (on
which Romney has lavished praise) cuts services to the poor and cuts taxes for
the rich. It will extend the Bush tax cuts and “cut the top rate for
individuals and corporations from 35 percent to 25 percent.” Then it will slash “Medicaid, Pell Grants,
food stamps, and low-income housing. These programs to help the poor . . . absorb two-thirds of Ryan’s cuts” (Jonathan
Chiat, “War on the Weak,” Newsweek,
April 18, 2011).
The prophet Isaiah writes: “Woe to those who make unjust laws, to those
who issue oppressive decrees, to deprive the poor of their rights and withhold
justice from the oppressed of my people. . . ” (Isaiah 10:1-2).
thanks for the thoughts, Dave. I haven't read any Ayn Rand and it was enlightening for me to read this post. Emily Kramer
ReplyDeleteHey, Dave.
ReplyDeleteI read your excellent U.S. presidential election blog today. I was deeply worried this fall that Romney/Ryan's run might prevail and greatly relieved that President Obama did. Your piece gives weighty reasons why R/R should not have won, but I noticed that Christian people seemed curiously blind to Romney's Mormon belief (not Christian in any sense, a religion that fits in, blends in, changes to fit circumstances as Romney himself does), nor gave a hoot about Paul Ryan's deadly, practiced Ayn Randism.
Ayn Rand (books, philosophy of mighty me) pops up other election years in Republican mythology. In 1964, I read Atlas Shrugged in college days to impress a Calvin female friend, when a bunch of Calvin kids were into Randism. Well before November 6th the Edgerton Enterprise ran a syndicated column by a writer who said that she "hoped to celebrate Romney's election on 11/6) but went on to show that Mormon religion is anything but Christian. (This column was the best summary of Mormonism I have read, of a religion whose theology is hard to figure out.). As things turned out in Edgerton, Minnesota voting, Romney received five votes for every one for Barack Obama. Consider that in the '52 election (remember our unanimous class vote for "Ike"?) the Edgerton vote was 3 to 1 in favor of Eisenhower, according to the Enterprise's history section.
On Election Day, the Oakdale Park CRC polling place was packed by our neighbors all day, almost 1200 votes cast. I worried less about outcomes after seeing people I know voting, mostly poor, mostly people of color, many hanging on to little kids, most of them people who do not support no-limit abortion nor gay marriage but do support the President.
A terrific turnout and these folks were not voting for R/R.
Thanks for writing. Be well. John Rozeboom