Why I've Been Writing about Advertising
More than thirty years ago, I developed and taught a high
school course called Mass Media in which one of the primary units dealt with
advertising. The focus of the course was
not to help students become effective marketers of some product but to
become discerning users of mass media.
Since mass media—newspapers, books, radio, television, and (the just
emerging) computer services, etc.—filled much of the world our students lived in, we
(the English Department of West Michigan Christian High School) believed that
they should understand how media worked and how it worked on them—informing,
persuading, inspiring, manipulating, and seducing them. In that context I used Vance Packard’s The Hidden Persuaders and became
convinced of its significance.
Recently I picked it up again, a ripped and tattered paperback
with lots of underlining and folded corners of pages, and was again convinced
of its significance. As I read it, I wondered if anyone today is worried about
the moral issues inherent in so much advertising. Do Christian high schools and colleges
struggle with concepts like the permissible lie, exploitation of sexual/psychological
sensitivities, caveat emptor, and
psychological obsolescence as they are used in media? Are they concerned with the way advertising objectifies
humans as consumers so that we are no longer homo sapiens (thinking persons but what Erich Fromm called homo consumens (consuming persons)?
Reformed Christians believe that humans are made in the
image of God and they often develop Christian schools in an attempt to educate
the minds and hearts of their children to desire biblical truth and beauty and
justice. But how can that happen if simultaneously they allow media to shape
them into consumers?
I suppose one can assert, as George Will does (see previous
blog), that advertising does not really have much effect on our desires. But virtually all businesses seem to believe
the opposite. Or one could assert that
it is an essential part of human nature, a part of the image of God in us, to
constantly want new and different things. But there’s no biblical evidence for
that but is evidence to the contrary.
In America today, consuming stuff is considered a patriotic
duty. Whenever people buy more stuff
(houses, durable goods, Christmas presents) than they have been buying, the
media tells us this is wonderful news. If people buy more stuff, then more workers
are needed and unemployment goes down and our standard of living goes up and,
we are in effect told, all’s right with the world. But is it?
Does our stuff bring contentment?
Does the manipulation worked upon us by marketers bring us nearer to
God? Does the degradation of creation
that comes with excessive production please God?
As I said at the top, I wonder if Christian schools—grade
schools, high schools, colleges—concern themselves with these questions in their
curricula.
In his very quotable book, Engaging God's World: A Reformed Vision of Faith, Learning, and Living, Cornelius Plantinga Jr. states that, "We human beings want God even when we think that what we really want is a green valley, or a good time from our past, or a loved one." (Or a flat screen TV, I might add.)
ReplyDeleteAt the deep heart of advertising techniques is the manipulation of our very sensus divinitatis, our innate awareness of and desire for God twisted to sell iPhones, diamonds, and diapers.
Certainly advertising and propaganda are part of the course of study at my local high school, as are the effects of modern technology, social media, and consumerism on our work, our relationships, and our spiritual lives/calling. I'd invite you to a few of the classes, but the commute is a bit of an obstacle.
It's a pleasure to have you blogging again.
Scott: Good to "hear" your voice again and it's good also to know that you are still fighting the fight in the classroom and raising awareness of the old media demons. Plantinga is certainly one of our CRC treasures.
ReplyDeleteDave